Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 19,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 4:07 am
United States are taught to every first-year law student. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
The Court held in its judgment of June 11th 2009 in Dubus S.A. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
The human rights and feminist lawyers were hopeful. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
- Ed)The ruling :European Court of Human Rights : Yusuf Salduz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
Professor Howard similarly stated that the skilled person could have engineered a minigene construct including rearranged V, D and J segments. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 pm
District Court, in the Old Dominion state of Virginia, an employment lawsuit ostensibly fit for a modern-day Atticus Finch was recently heard – Bland v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:26 am
Nnyanzi v United Kingdom (Application No 21878/06) European Court of Human Rights “There was no reason to belive that an applicant who unsuccessfully sought asylum, on the basis of her father's political activities in Uganda, would be ill treated on her expulsion to that state. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:50 am
This is, in Sumption’s words one of the great unspoken problems about human rights law, which is that very many human rights issues are in reality not issues between the state and its citizens. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:20 am
The European Court of Human Rights yesterday held that Turkey violated Art. 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights when it convicted members of a religious group known as Aczimendi tarikatÿ for the clothing they wore. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
The purpose of the application is to promote the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews important decisions from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.SUBSTANTIVE RULINGSVizcaya v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:50 pm
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews important decisions from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.SUBSTANTIVE RULINGSKerry Pinkney v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
Facts: This case (Lough v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011) January 4, 2012 European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
As established in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:49 am
If you handle employment discrimination cases in New York City, you know that the New York City Human Rights Law extends far greater protections to employees than Title VII or the New York State Human Rights Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
