Search for: "In re Grant" Results 321 - 340 of 33,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“I’m speaking on behalf of the family because they’re distraught. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:00 am
As Mitchell Rubinstein notes at his Adjunct Law Prof Blog, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a case raising the issue of whether parties can contractually alter the terms of judicial review in an arbitration decision governed by the... [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:38 am
This Thursday, the Federal Circuit will hear oral arguments en banc in In re Bilski (No. 2007-1130), a case that will help define the scope of patentable subject matter. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Health and Human Services, (ND IL, Jan. 3, 2012), an Illinois federal district court granted a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate against a for-profit company that that facilitates re-entry of injured workers into the workforce. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:06 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
TEXAS SUPREME COURT GRANTS EMPLOYER'S PETITION FOR MANDAMUS TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEE TO ARBITRATE HER WRONGFUL TERMINATION CLAIM In Re Polymerica, L.L.C., (Tex. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In an order, dated June 11, 2018, the court granted the motion without opposition and ordered an immediate trial on damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm by BuckleySandler
In re Application of The Bank of New York Mellon, No. 651786/11, slip op. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 5:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen In re Acer America Corporation (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Two weeks ago, when I reported on the Supreme Court's grant of review in In re Tobacco II and Pfizer, I pointed out that the two Court of Appeal opinions were "no longer citable as precedent. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 5:38 pm
All the while, we pretend that the Governor's decision is "neutral" even though we all know full well that we're really just engaging in Kabuki theatre.But whatever. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:49 pm
" After a patent has been unsuccessfully challenged through re-examination, its value is considered higher. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:59 am by Steve McConnell
We have had our flings with some other doctrines, such as res ipsa loquitur. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:44 am by Tracy Coenen
Because Koss management could have (and should have) done exactly what they’re saying Grant Thornton should  have done. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:16 am by Ettinger Law Firm
In 2010, the Executor filed a petition to permit the sale of real estate to heirs, which was subsequently granted by orphans’ court. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
  The Court granted cert. limited to the first question presented in Kawashima v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:53 pm
In the case of the Wrights, people who arrived in the field later tried to use the Langley machine (which never flew)as prior art against the Wrights.See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-office-action-rejects-claims-of.html http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-obviousness-challenge-to-warfs-780.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/10/uspto-grants-pubpat-re-exam-request-on.html [read post]