Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 321 - 340
of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2014, 7:46 pm
Here’s the first one, on my background and deciding to come to NC State: And for those who like knowing what they’re about to watch, here are the questions they ask me and the timestamps for them: Questions in this Clip: 0:00:19 – Before we begin talking about your time at State, we’d like to talk to you about where you’re originally from? [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:19 pm
I mean part of what we're getting at later in this conversation is what's happening across the state, but that is starting to catch on around the state, and I think you're going to see more and more counties adopting that model of getting people appointed counsel or public defenders at that initial hearing. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:25 pm
Here is the text of the initial response from Robert Klein, chairman of the California stem cell agency until July 2011, to questions from the California Stem Cell Report (CSCR) concerning his $21,630 donation to the agency. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
In re Search of Tobaccoville USA, Inc., 2009 U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
”During traffic stops, Dixon suggested requiring officers to identify themselves and state why they pulled the driver over before asking questions. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
As a courtesy, we’re always willing to review other attorney’s retainer agreements and advise you on whether or not they not only comply with California law, but also have your best interest in mind. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
On September 27th, the original bidders were notified that a FAR 52.233-3 “Protest After Award” was filed with the GAO, a stay of contract was issued, all proposals would be re-reviewed, and corrective action would be completed no later than November 10, 2011. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:21 pm
Whatever other state they're currently living in, they discover that no License can be issued there until they "clear up" their Michigan License. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
’” Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
The rules of procedure in Massachusetts bankruptcy court are clear; just as the rules of civil procedure are in state and federal courts: When you file a "complaint" to initiate a civil lawsuit in court, the rules require a "short and plain statement" regarding 1. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:02 am
And I’m saying Okay, so one of our former guests, Sarah Lin has a new article out and titled “10 ways data science can help librarians. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
A counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity and a defence of "we're only using our own name" both failed. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:54 pm
A frequently asked question in our practice is, can an acronym register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and be protected as a federal trademark? [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
As stated in a previous post, the Florida Constitution permits amendment by ballot initiative. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:45 pm
When the court is looking at what this stuff is worth … Let’s take this example where the car is worth 5 and you owe 10. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
The case appears (to my bleary eyes) to raise the same question as United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:22 am
Civ. 1ère, 6 avril 2011, n°10-19053). [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:55 am
How steep state revenue losses are and how long they will continue will substantially depend on the answers to these questions. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:41 am
My initial response was that fibromyalgia cases were rarely approved at the administrative (initial application or reconsideration) levels because there is no "listing" for fibromyalgia and adjudicators at the State Agencies did not have the expertise or authority to issue early approvals. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 pm
On page 41 of the transcript, Justice Alito asked Alabama’s Solicitor General this question:You can see from these questions that the arguments that you're making in this capital case, which is sui generis, are pushing the Court to consider rules that would have far-reaching effect, such as a rule that places upon a clerk of the court a constitutional obligation to serve counsel with important documents in the case similar to the constitutional obligation to serve… [read post]
