Search for: "Leah Litman"
Results 321 - 340
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman and Kyle Skinner note that “[t]he Solicitor General recently filed a petition for certiorari asking the Supreme Court to review a constitutional challenge to the so-called expedited removal system,” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:43 am
” At casetext, Leah Litman argues “that the Supreme Court should exercise its discretion to weigh in on whether it has made” its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am
”In the latest episode of First Mondays, Kate Shaw and others join Leah Litman “to take a deep dive into issues that regularly come up on the show. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:03 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman looks at one aspect of “the sentencing fallout from” Sessions v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Leah Litman and Jaime Santos “recap some of the Supreme Court’s October cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
At casetext, Leah Litman looks at what Monday’s opinion in Montgomery v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
Early commentary comes from Garrett Epps for The Atlantic; Leah Litman for the New York Times; Lisa Soronen for CitiesSpeak; Ilya Shapiro for the Cato Institute; Ezra Klein at Vox; Mark Walsh for Education Week; Ian Milhiser of Think Progress, as well as Aaron Rupar; Ruthann Robson for Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Colin Kalmbacher of Law & Crime; Scott Lemieux for The Week; Andrew Cohen of the Brennan Center for Justice; Matt Ford for The New Republic; First Amendment… [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
” In the inaugural episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), hosts Leah Litman, Melissa Murray, Jamie Santos and Kate Shaw “recap two of this term’s biggest opinions–partisan gerrymandering and the census” — and “walk through a theme of this term (stare decisis) before talking about the podcast’s role in Supreme Court legal culture. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:50 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman maintains that a letter from the solicitor general to the court correcting the record after the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
For UC-Irvine prawf Leah Litman, however, clawing from possible to probable isn’t fearful enough. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:04 pm
(Leah Litman offers a good critique of the anti-novelty principle.)But consider the following: denying tax-exempt status to religious institutions that discriminate against LGBTQ people in connection with their social service activities. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
*Strict ScrutinyStrict Scrutiny is part of the Crooked Media podcast family and is hosted by three constitutional law professors, Leah Litman (U. of Michigan Law School), Kate Shaw (Yeshiva University Benjamin N. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 5:04 am
In the aftermath of deafening silence by the Reinhardt brotherhood, Michigan prawf Leah Litman took up arms against the crickets. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Constitutional law scholars Laurence Tribe and Leah Litman promptly and thoroughly dismantled the “reasoning” behind the decision in Missouri v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am
In a new episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Leah Litman and Jaime Santos “recap a lot of the big November cases, including Kansas v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman and Joshua Matz call the result “a resounding victory for the rule of law over the rule of Trump. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman takes issue with each of the government’s arguments in favor of its restrictive interpretation of the Supreme Court’s order. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
” Briefly: In op-ed for The New York Times, Leah Litman and Tonja Jacobi maintain that during the recent telephonic arguments at the Supreme Court, for which the chief justice served as timekeeper, Roberts’ “uneven application of the rules was … gendered and ideological, as interruptions have been in previous courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:27 am
” In commentary, online at The New York Times, law professor Leah Litman and Jay Willis have an essay titled “Will the Supreme Court Gut the Voting Rights Act? [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:58 am
” In an article accessible at SSRN, Leah Litman analyzes speaking time during the recent telephonic Supreme Court arguments, noting that “[s]eventy-five percent of the twelve longest questioning periods were from male Justices (who make up 67% of the Court), all of them conservative. [read post]
