Search for: "Lemon v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
  At this point, Justice Fruchter jumped in to recite the three prongs of the test first articulated in Lemon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:30 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Because I think the Lemon test has been superseded by and subsumed into the endorsement test ("The proper inquiry under the purpose prong of Lemon, I submit, is whether the government intends to convey a message of endorsement or disapproval of religion," Lynch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:56 am by Kevin Walsh
Bruce Church), or (2) judicial selectivity about which facts matter and why (as often happens in the effects prong of Establishment Clause analysis under Lemon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am by Frank Ravitch
He did not specifically name the tests, but he was most likely referring to the endorsement test, the indirect coercion test and the Lemon test, derived from the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
An assistant state attorney general, Joseph L. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Galloway or some other test; and (3) whether, if the test from Lemon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
Those changes limited the “probative value” of the President’s campaign statements in demonstrating the religious animus required for a violation of the Establishment Clause under the Supreme Court’s test in Lemon v. [read post]