Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 321 - 340
of 14,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 5:29 am
If the long working days of the city trade mark lawyer simply aren’t long enough for you, or your blackberry just won’t flash its evil red eye at you as regularly as you’d like, help is at hand from indie game developer The Men Who Wear Many Hats in the form of the smartphone game “Intern Saga: Trademark Lawyer”. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:01 am
However, if the case gets to trial, the patentee then has the burden of proving that it complied with Section 287 (either showing that the products were marked or they didn’t need to be marked). [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:17 pm
It's not often that a decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on a Community trade mark matter runs to 207 paragraphs and has its own Table of Contents (inconveniently situated at the end of the decision, where you might not immediately think of looking for it), but this morning's ruling in Joined Cases T-225/06, T-255/06, T-257/06 and T-309/06 BudÄâ [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 10:18 am
The mark, filed in 2002 as a figurative mark, covers “footwear, including sports footwear”, and was registered only in 2020, following lengthy opposition proceedings (see inter alia T-479/08). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:52 pm
I don't think so. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:03 am
Just because we haven't been blogging much about the SEC's pursuit of Mark Cuban on insider trading charges doesn't mean we're not interested. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:05 pm
The pertinent passage is his closing: I myself don't find these arguments particularly strong, but that -- on the CLS view -- doesn't mean anything about what constitutional law on this matter "really" is. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
” And here, I’ve learned again today that a “Don’t Walk” signal means “Run. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 18, 2009, from 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:52 pm
We here in the CommLawBlog bunker don’t get out much, but the FCBA Auction is one of those Be-There-Or-Be-Square shindigs that can’t be missed. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:22 am
Patently O has a discussion of a manuscript by Mark Lemley et al [ “Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
That’s just one of Mark’s projects, she says. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
A suggestive mark, like a descriptive mark, should be protected only upon a showing that the mark has developed source significance in the minds of consumers.Very interesting and largely persuasive, though I think he misreads my Gone in 60 Milliseconds--he argues that quick mistakes are very hard to correct, but my points was that (accurate) recognition delays, allegedly produced by the presence of diluting marks, haven't been shown to affect real… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
Muller-Moore printing t-shirts that say “Eat More Kale. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:00 pm
It cannot refuse to register marks because it concludes that such marks will be disparaging to others. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:32 am
"So the moral of the story is clear, says Merpel: you shouldn't be in a stronger position by opting out of the litigation than if you had remained in it. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:02 am
Does the Security Council matter if it can’t change behaviors on the ground? [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
Over to Tom for his report on AIPPI's Trade Mark Tuesday: “Don’t miss the (right) mark” In the first session of the day, the panel addressed issues surrounding registrability and regulatory matters affecting the approval and enforcement of pharma trade marks in Brazil, the US, Canada and the Philippines. [read post]
9 May 2022, 12:15 pm
At this point it is standard practice, most importantly in matters of personnel. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Wouldn’t it be easier to simply say that perhaps Yoshida’s trade marks were not that distinctive? [read post]