Search for: "McCann v. McCann" Results 321 - 340 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 7:29 pm
Vermont Law School Professor Michael McCann's approach in "American Needle v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
Some serious reading first on American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:59 am
Michael McCann (Vermont Law School) has posted American Needle v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:57 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Jason McCann, Case No. 3:09-cv-03209-SI, filed in N.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 2:16 pm by Richard Symmes
  Former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon aims to challenge this policy and gain royalties for all former football and basketball student athletes from the past and future in the class action lawsuit Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:09 am
Sports Law Blog’s Michael McCann offers up some analysis the recently filed Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:05 pm
Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee and Clarett v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:50 am
Summary of Decision issued July 6, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: McCann v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Second Department's decision accepted MHS's argument without elaboration and vacated the order dismissing the petition, writing as follows: A claim for dissolution of a foreign limited liability company is one over which the New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d 799; Matter of Porciello v Sound Moves, 253 AD2d 467; Matter of Warde-McCann v Commex, Ltd., 135 AD2d 541). [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
Whilst the test of “necessity” under s.1(1)(b) Crime and Disorder Act 1998, is one of judgment (Lord Steyn in R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court [2002] UKHL 39; [2003] 1 AC 787) there would be nothing wrong with giving courts some guidance as to when it would be appropriate to consider exercising that judgment, or the procedure to be adopted. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
If it isn’t, then how on earth can the UK contend that domestic law ever complies with the procedural safeguards required in McCann v UK and Cosic v Croatia? [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Defence Estates v L and another, High Court (Administrative Court, Collins J, 5.5.09) [2009] All ER (D) 20 (May) is - potentially - quite an important case on the ongoing Qazi/Kay/Doherty/Connors/McCann/Cosic debate about the role of Article 8 in possession proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
They don't seem to refer to the question of whether the court can order a party to carry out analysis of ("data mine") electronic records - thus leaving unaltered the effect of the ruling in Dome Telecom v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [2009] EWCA Civ 285 was an appeal of a summary possession that had been stayed pending Doherty in the Lords. [read post]