Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan"
Results 321 - 340
of 364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
â€) (citing New York Times); City of Chicago v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Wainwright and New York Times v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
At a panel discussion about the Guantanamo lawyers, Ramzi Kassem -- a City University of New York law professor representing one of the current detainees - said: "What matters more than when [the closing] happens is what happens to the [200] men still there. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
Laurence Steinberg acted as scientific consultant on the amicus curiae brief submitted by the American Psychological Association in Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
Since he's (arguably) a celebrity, he'd be considered a public figure and would have to satisfy the higher actual malice standard set out in The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
It was a bad trip, since Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Even though Albritton was not a public figure, he ruled, the “actual malice” standard adopted by the Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Sullivan, 978 F.2d 560, 562-63 (9th Cir. 1992); Biotics Research Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The first amicus brief was filed by The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Gannet Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:49 am
New York State Div. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
The New York office hired me to work in their London, England office assisting Americans living and working overseas with their tax structures, tax returns and tax compliance. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with "actual malice"Shulman v Hunderfund, 2009 NY Slip Op 02263, Decided on March 26, 2009, Court of AppealsIn the words of Justice Smith, "In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
"Further, said the court, the plaintiff must also show that the defamatory statement is actionable "irrespective of special harm" [defamation per se] or that publication of the statement caused special harm [defamation per quod].If, however, the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, the Circuit Court said that the First Amendment requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's statements are false and that the defendant acted with actual malice, citing… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
