Search for: "Parente v. State Board of Equalization" Results 321 - 340 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
Not later than 30 days after the close of each quarter, the Comptroller shall transfer to the Virginia Commercial Spaceflight Authority an amount from the general fund that is equal to the estimate provided by the Tax Commissioner. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
Denn 15-1234Issue: Whether a state's interest in “increas[ing] . . . information concerning those who support the candidates,” Buckley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Lindsay F. Wiley, Steve Vladeck
Jacobson upheld a Massachusetts statute authorizing local health boards to make smallpox vaccination mandatory for all residents if, in the opinion of the medical experts on the board, it was necessary to protect the public’s health. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
For example, Maryland’s amended law prohibits noncompete clauses for employees who earn less than or equal to 150 percent of the state minimum wage ($15.00/hour effective January 1, 2024). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 2:02 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Guidance clearly states that the EEOC views participating in any capacity in a complaint process or other protected equal employment opportunity as protected activity which is protected from retaliation under all circumstances. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It’s Not Clear How They Would Do That Center for Responsive Politics – Jessica Piper | Published: 8/2/2019 Matching – when campaigns tell donors that their contributions will be equaled or multiplied by an unknown source – has emerged as a relatively common fundraising tool among groups across the political spectrum in recent years. [read post]
Furthermore, the SEC proposes concurrently to eliminate its longstanding rule that company proxy cards may provide stockholders the option to vote for all management nominees as one slate, depriving the board’s nominating committee of one of its traditional state-law functions, namely, composing a slate of directors who, taken as a whole, have the individual and complementary talents believed best suited for optimal board oversight. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
For the board, this explains why it was possible that e-mail C5 corresponding to the final feature of current claim 1, i.e. the feature of claim 5 of the parent application (just like C3 corresponding to current claim 3, i.e. the feature of claim 7 of the parent application), could be sent on 25 January 2000 (C3: 17 January 2000), i.e. before the filing date of the parent application on 1 February 2000, from Mr de Vries of AkzoNobel to Mr Mooij, the representative… [read post]