Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 10:45 am
Reception and integration of displaced people from Ukraine (European Parliament, April 2024) [text] Safe Homes: Lessons learnt from private hosting initiatives for people fleeing Ukraine (European Commission, April 2024) [text] - See also related Red Cross EU report. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:12 am
The case is Governors Ridge Office Park Association v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
In Hess v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
In addition, most of the cultural goods looted during World War II crossed multiple borders. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
" Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
The GG v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the past day, the encampment, which sits between John V. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
Nor may the prosecution use “prior convictions or proof of the prior commission of specific, criminal, vicious or immoral acts” other than to impeach the accused’s credibility (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 , 374 [ 1974]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of Mata v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
Indeed, he made the “mistake” of including people in senior administration positions who remained loyal to the Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
” Ideally, that should not require cross referencing British and French dictionaries, let alone Canadian, Australian, and others. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
We also explain how to get deal with the badly flawed 1926 ruling in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
