Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 3,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 7:49 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
One of the issues on appeal before the SJC in this case was the reliance by the defendants of a United States Supreme Court Case, Florida v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am by emagraken
  A more surgical response is to remedy the deficiency by reading in the under-inclusive indigency provision in the Rules to include people who are “in need”: see Schachter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am by Jenna A. Agatep
Ultimately, however, he agreed to affirm the Superior Court’s decision. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:50 pm
This Ontario Superior Court action was reported in the National Review of Medicine: Ontario's single-payer healthcare system is on trial.A new lawsuit, filed in Ontario Superior Court by two brain-tumour patients on September 5, alleges Ontario's injunction against private healthcare violates the right to life, liberty and security of the person, as guaranteed under Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  Footnote 2 of the opinion says:  "Although the rationale is unclear to this court, Proposition 64 differentiates cannabis, which must be in an unopened, sealed, container, from 'loose cannabis flower,' which only needs to be in a closed container. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:31 am
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 730, 746 [“The issue of leave to amend is always open”]; Wennerholm v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Superior Court, a case addressing the legal standard for determining whether a worker should be classified as an independent contractor or an employee. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Superior Court (Pearson) (2010) 48 Cal.4th 564, 571.)People v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
The trial court denied the request and on May 8, 2024 the Superior Court affirmed. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
” However, the Court found such review by a superior executive officer is absent for the PTAB and APJs. [read post]