Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Even if or when this Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:06 am
But in a ruling this week, the Ontario Court of Appeal said a judge may, but is not required to, make observations from video evidence.In R. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
I generally like the published opinions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:45 am by bvertz
A recent Superior Court decision, Childress v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:45 am by bvertz
A recent Superior Court decision, Childress v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:32 pm by Pamela Fasick
Dismissal of Misdemeanors Because No Courtroom Was Available is UpheldPeople v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:49 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
One of the issues on appeal before the SJC in this case was the reliance by the defendants of a United States Supreme Court Case, Florida v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am by emagraken
  A more surgical response is to remedy the deficiency by reading in the under-inclusive indigency provision in the Rules to include people who are “in need”: see Schachter v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:50 pm
This Ontario Superior Court action was reported in the National Review of Medicine: Ontario's single-payer healthcare system is on trial.A new lawsuit, filed in Ontario Superior Court by two brain-tumour patients on September 5, alleges Ontario's injunction against private healthcare violates the right to life, liberty and security of the person, as guaranteed under Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am by Jenna A. Agatep
Ultimately, however, he agreed to affirm the Superior Court’s decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  Footnote 2 of the opinion says:  "Although the rationale is unclear to this court, Proposition 64 differentiates cannabis, which must be in an unopened, sealed, container, from 'loose cannabis flower,' which only needs to be in a closed container. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 am
While most business people are aware that they have certain rights against parties who have misrepresented material facts, a Massachusetts Superior Court case decided this week on a Motion for Summary Judgment, suggests an odd standard of reasonableness. [read post]