Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am
In a court filing prior to the hearing, Ellis’s legal team had pointed to Georgia Court of Appeals precedent in Kenerly v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Here's Ramsey: I was initially skeptical of the major questions doctrine (MQD), as deployed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
" Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 8:47 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:04 am
Montera v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:51 pm
From today's opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court in Cousins v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
Citing Supreme Court decisions in Eastland v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm
Their brief asks the California Court of Appeal First Appellate District to overturn a San Francisco Superior Court judge’s ruling in the city’s favor. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 10:21 am
” A more recent federal circuit court case is United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 4:59 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Are the higher pleasures infinitely superior and always trump any quantity of lower? [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
There is a good reason that one speaks of rabbinic "courts" atop any given Chasidic movement. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:19 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 2:48 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 3:34 pm
THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Speakers who claim first-hand knowledge of some incident are essentially claiming to have superior expertise about the incident: They were present, and (usually) very few other people were. [read post]
