Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
The partnership did not go well. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So the European Court for Human Rights held in Case of Stübing v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
Following a stay in a rehabilitation facility in the late 1970s, the claimant was able to stop using drugs for a period of about nine years. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
" But the First Amendment protects people's right to speak about others, including using others' images and "information about" them. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:09 am
In that 2005 case, Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:18 pm
See Whitfield v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Law enforcement agencies surely do not have to publish the names of people they are investigating and wire-tapping (with warrants!) [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 1:14 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:34 pm
See also, e.g., Dempsey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Small guys benefit as well, just as in most other markets. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
In his dissent in Bostock v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Yale University taught a course in the 1970s titled “The Economics of Corruption” which described corruption or moral hazard as a function of the likely rewards of the corruption v. the likely penalty if caught, with likelihood of success or likelihood of being caught factored into the equation. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
J. 34:347, 348).The opinions of Justices Gorsuch and Ginsberg are both short and well worth reading. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
In Lindo v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
That is precisely the analysis for this case as well. 2. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
Islam v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'”… [read post]
