Search for: "Perry v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
("Perry"), originally filed this diversity breach of contract action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana alleging breach of an agreement by Bowie to pay certain commissions to Perry, an obligation which Perry alleged had been assumed by Appalachian Fuels as a result of the purchase agreement. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
For the first time in our nation's history, three women will be sitting together on the bench of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm by Lowell Brown
Momentum is strong in the wake of the court’s June 2013 decisions in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued two rulings that were met with a roar of approval from equal rights advocates from coast to coast. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:48 am by The LBN Team
The United States Supreme Court denied Wyeth’s request for review of an almost $60 million verdict, ending a seven year fight between Wyeth and three Nevada women. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in Liese v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Shultz Former Secretary of State   General Michael V. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Cone Memorial Hospital, 460 U.S. 1 (1983); Perry v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
United States invalidated Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Famighetti & Weinick
Today’s Long Island employment law blog takes a closer look at the facts of the case – Perry v. [read post]