Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
Compare Dvora v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 9:31 am
The first dispute, Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:34 pm
Plant Insulation Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:33 pm
Nuclear Operat-ing Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
PPG Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
"In view of our decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:28 am
See State v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am
Judge Agee filed a separate, lengthy dissent (Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:28 pm
See Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:33 am
Judge Gruender filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Southern Bakeries, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:59 am
Plant Equipment v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
