Search for: "Rantanen"
Results 321 - 340
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
” In his essay on the decision, Jason Rantanen wrote that these holdings are “probably erroneous—doctrinal developments. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
By Jason Rantanen and Nikola Datzov. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re: Juniper Networks (Panel: Judges Dyk, Prost, Hughes) By my count, it’s been over a month and a half since the Federal Circuit issued a decision granting a petition for writ of mandamus arising from the Western District of Texas. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 8:45 am
Rantanen. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:38 pm
By Jason Rantanen Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:07 pm
By Jason Rantanen While this might not be the most newsworthy federal document archives story this week, it’s something that patent practitioners and others who practice before the Federal Circuit might want to take note of. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
By Jason Rantanen We recently launched an updated version of the Compendium of Federal Circuit Decisions that contains information on decisions posted to the Federal Circuit’s website for all origins, not just appeals arising from the USPTO and District Courts (although the richest data is still for appeals from those sources). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law; Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; and Jason Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law Recently, we wrote about the small number of mandamus decisions on transfer of venue that the Federal Circuit has designated as precedential and about how those precedential decisions are unrepresentative of overall outcomes. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the second post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Celgene Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
By Jason Rantanen University of Massachusetts, Carmel Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the first post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
As Jason Rantanen noted at Patently-O, Judge Taranto's concurrence from the denial of rehearing en banc in Halo explained that this is not the right case, but that some § 284 issues could warrant en banc review in a future case. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 1:31 pm
” Interior Minister Mari Rantanen said Sunday that the authorities were monitoring the situation and that the government was “ready to use all legislative powers to ensure border security if necessary. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:49 am
Mari Rantanen, the Finnish Minister of the Interior, remarked that the Finnish government will take stronger measures if necessary. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:52 am
Interior Minister Mari Rantanen said that with no signs of Russia changing its behavior, the security situation remains unchanged, and authorities estimate that thousands of migrants continue to wait at the Russian border seeking asylum in Finland. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Lemley (Stanford)[151 downloads] Peripheral Disclosure by Jason Rantanen (U. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Prof Rantanen also points out that the mark may still be protectable under Section 43(a) as an unregistered mark, but that the law is unsettled. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:40 am
Rantanen). [read post]
