Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 321 - 340
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 9:13 pm
9:00 Opening Remarks 9:15-10:45 Panel One: Helene Landemore, DEMOCRATIC REASON: to be discussed by Dennis Thompson and Paul Woodruff 11-12:30 Panel Two: Jamie Kelly, FRAMING DEMOCRACY: A BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO DEMOCRATIC THEORY: Joseph Fishkin and Jeffrey Friedman 2-3:30 Panel Three: Ilya Somin, DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL IGNORANCE: Heather Gerken and Sandy Levinson 3:45-5:15 Panel Four: General discussion on the… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:12 pm
Sandy Levinson said...Frankly, one of the pathologies of our thinking is the belief that "dictators" are omnipotent (or, as I originally had written, omniscient) within their countries. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
WhittingtonAs I recently noted, Repugnant Laws has now been published by the University Press of Kansas in its excellent Constitutional Thinking series edited by Sandy Levinson and Jeff Tulis. [read post]
7 May 2016, 12:52 pm
And because parties are key elements of our constitutional order, their continuous malfunction puts the legitimacy of that order into serious question.As Sandy Levinson has argued on this blog for a number of years, I think sometimes we tend to concentrate on the battles between the parties, on which party is at fault for what mess rather than looking at the broader picture of systemic failure. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
Sandy Levinson pointed the way even earlier in 1989, with his articulation of "protestant constitutionalism" in Constitutional Faith. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Owen Fiss, Sandy Levinson, Ronald Dworkin, Stanley Fish, Gerry Graff, Walter Michaels, all of whom glance sideways at Judge Posner; each with a connection to literature and the liberal arts, each a Jew of a certain age. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Comparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 8:20 am
Roosevelt's effort to forge a purer coalition stalled his program completely.For the past year, my friend and co-blogger Sandy Levinson has called for a political movement for constitutional reform. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:34 pm
"I agree with Sandy on one thing: Senator Gillibrand's response to the story is weak. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
Sandy Levinson shrewdly notes that The Partisan Republic does not fit easily into the most familiar models of scholarship we have become accustomed to as academics. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
In fact, my friend Sandy Levinson has argued that there are many parts of our Constitution that should be regarded as dealbreakers. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
We also discuss important differences between the more ideological Republican party and the more constituent-driven Democratic party; these differences are critical in understanding Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese’s transformative role in shaping legal policy through his embrace of the then-fledgling Federalist Society (an observation that is prominently featured in Sandy Levinson’s and Jack Balkin’s posts). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
8 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:10 pm
Nita Farahany has posted the following paper to SSRN: "Law and Behavioral Morality" NOMOS LII: EVOLUTION AND MORALITY, Sandy Levinson, ed., 2009Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-03 NITA A. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
On the blog Balkinization, professors Jason Mazzone and Sandy Levinson engaged in a heated discussion as to the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
At Balkinization, Sandy Levinson argues that Linda Greenhouse’s suggestion that the Court has effectively imposed a lower standard for ineffective assistance of counsel in death penalty appeals for veterans could be seen as a form of affirmative action. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:17 pm
If I remember correctly, Sandy Levinson suggested that the argument is, in today's conditions, pretty much irrelevant to the school-voucher and charitable-choice questions. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:55 am
Some people, like Sandy Levinson, argue that this is because those states have dysfunctional constitutions. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
If Sandy Levinson had been around then, he probably would have denounced the "egregious House of Representatives. [read post]
