Search for: "Smith v. Doe"
Results 321 - 340
of 7,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 7:14 am
Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 1444446 (M.D.Ala. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
Washington v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:42 pm
This review system was created by Congress in the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:42 am
On July 16, in Smith v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:47 pm
Noonan -- The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has benefited, particularly after enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, from the deference to its factual findings mandated by the Supreme Court's interpretation in Dickenson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:56 pm
Strieff, and calling to mind 1984's Winston Smith: "Does 1 + 1 = 3? [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:10 am
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:15 pm
While the PTAB’s ruling was ultimately remanded to the USPTO Director for review under Arthrex v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:15 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:44 am
"What does that mean? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm
Smith, 2011 ONSC 5131. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:53 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:33 pm
Anna's case, or Stern v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:35 am
It held that the lease does not require an "independent" certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses and that the landlord complied with the lease provisions by employing its internal certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:28 pm
Smith timely appealed.State v. [read post]
