Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 321 - 340 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IP tango)   Poland Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark (Class 46)   Spain Supreme Court clarifies on when to start a civil trade mark infringement case (Class 46)   Sweden Svea Court of Appeal finds claim anticipated - construes claim on basis of terms of the claim, rather than purposive construction adopted by District Court: Pullman-Ermator v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Poland: a milestone for Poland while a tiny brick for other countries: on the recent ECtHR judgment on the obligation of states parties to provide legal recognition of same-sex relationships, which we noted here. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Rick Houghton
  Articles IV and V oblige the U.S government and Soviet Union to destroy the missiles’ “launchers[,] support structures and support equipment . . . associated with such missiles and launchers. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
  Reuters also informs us that Russia has called recent movement of NATO troops and military hardware to the Baltic states, Poland, and Germany a threat. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Madras High Court decision in Novartis Glivec case (Patentcircle) Israel: State of Israel sues Omrix for NIS 500 million, claiming core technology is based on service inventions. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The EUIPO published The Baseline of Trade Secrets Litigation in the EU Member States in 2018. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: []   Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – US: Federal Circuit revises Amgen v ITC (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Hal Wegner) (Patent Docs)   General Alicia Greenidge to step down as Director of IFPMA (Intellectual Property Watch) Flu crisis could lead to compulsory licences (Managing… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on… [read post]