Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2017, 7:56 am
Lewis, Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
“The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the litigious environment are creating a more risk-averse culture in the United States,” one former senior investment banker stated. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:42 am
For example, in the case of DVD-CCA v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Resolving an issue of statutory interpretation in the event the statutory language is ambiguousFeinman v County of Nassau, 2017 NY Slip Op 07110, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe plaintiffs [Plaintiffs] in this action had worked at the Office of the Nassau County Attorney from 2002 or 2003 until 2009 and prior to that time had worked for the City of New York or the State of New York. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:52 pm
The Montreal Convention’s preamble states that a goal of the Convention is the “harmonization and codification of. . . rules. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:37 am
The case was Harmon, et al., v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:12 am
United States has already had some coverage on the blog. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
This is illustrated in DogsBite.org v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:18 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In making the announcement the Minister stated: … Canadian Appeals MonitorKeeping Things in Context: B.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:52 am
The case of People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court decision Scott v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:03 pm
“Copyright troll Righthaven in its death throes, domain going up for auction” [Cory Doctorow, BoingBoing] Controversy over litigation finance continues [WaPo, NYPost] Presumably unrelated to above: “Unpaid Bills Land Some Debtors Behind Bars” [NPR] “Rent Control Violates Property Rights and Due Process” [Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus, Cato, on Harmon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:36 am
The Article contends that, in two recent decisions, the Supreme Court quietly established the severability of state statutes in federal court to be a matter of general federal common law, and that this doctrine is not only inexplicably inconsistent with dozens of cases decided since Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
[2] Markman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:03 am
Broadly speaking, national supervisory authorities designated by individual Member States would oversee and enforce the Regulation, with support from a new European Artificial Intelligence Board. [read post]
