Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 321 - 340 of 1,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is a professor of law and founder and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, and she is of counsel at Schnapper-Casteras PLLC. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Missud v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on Wearry v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
  He's talking about this one:  the state court judge in Idaho.Though both of 'em have the middle initial R.And, to my knowledge, have never been seen together in the same room.I'm thinking a Clark Kent/Superman thing.P.S. - On a serious note, check out this line from Judge Betty Fletcher's dissent:  "I am shocked by the conduct in this case. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Kent affects only states with statutes granting some kind of immunity subject to a fraud-on-the-FDA exception. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted The Founders’ Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Amy Howe
Hodges, holding that states must license marriages between same-sex couples, continues to spawn coverage and commentary. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
We argued that, in both the old and new world, agency head final-decisionmaking authority remains the standard (and preferred) model—something the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 6:49 pm by Josh Sturtevant
From the Project's 'About' tab:The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent is a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
”  Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences with a detailed analysis of what the ruling might mean for other inmates on the state’s death row. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
  One such case in which cert was denied, as noted by SCOTUSblog, was a "test of the constitutionality of the death penalty procedures in the state of Louisiana (Holmes v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958)(cruel and unusual punishment to strip citizenship as punishment; origin of "evolving standards of decency" test in Eighth Amendment jurisprudence)Kent v. [read post]