Search for: "State v. Million" Results 321 - 340 of 22,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by Ross M. Wolfe
Description/Success Story/Testimonial: Represented whistleblower in an action against two local hospitals for healthcare fraud, resulting in a $1.25 million settlement. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs claim that IXL “collected and monetized the data of millions of school-age children who used the IXL platform without parental consent,” in violation of the ECPA and state law. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
And the outcome will turn on the votes of millions of citizens rather than nine justices. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The original award in 2012[8] rejected all of Slovakia’s objections to the tribunal’s jurisdiction (paras. 152 – 180) and ordered Slovakia to pay €22.1 million in damages to Achmea (para. 352). [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
We generally stick to the product liability side of drug and device law, but occasionally we slip over to the medical malpractice side.One half of your dynamic blogging duo recently represented an obstetrician and health clinic in an appeal from the largest medical malpractice verdict in the history of the State of Ohio -- $30 million, with a motion on file for tens of millions more in prejudgment interest. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:04 am by Allison Zieve
Today, the Supreme Court granted a petition that asks whether the named plaintiff in a class action filed in state court can prevent removal of the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) by filing with the complaint a “stipulation” that states that the class will not damages of less than $5 million—the threshold for federal jurisdiction under CAFA.In the case before the Court, Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]