Search for: "State v. Sherman"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
United States, No. 06-7949, and Kimbrough v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:05 pm
In Medellin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
Briefly: At AP, Mark Sherman reports that “[b]oth sides of the abortion debate are waiting to see if the Supreme Court adds new disputes over state abortion regulations to its election-year docket[:] The court is expected [today] to announce new cases it will consider in the term that begins next week. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Sherman Act Sec. 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Standard Iron Works v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Monday the Supreme Court unanimously held the NFL's practice of collectively licensing the trademarks of all 32 individual teams is not immune from antitrust scrutiny under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:56 am
Sherman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
United States District Judge Dale S. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
United States District Judge Dale S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
United States, Maracich v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:53 am
Lightning-v-Harmon-Complaint [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
In addition, AP writer Mark Sherman reports on the the Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In Simpson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am
In 2012, Sherman sued the town of Chester in state court on a host of federal and state claims, including for a regulatory taking; the town removed the case to federal district court and the case took one trip to the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:26 pm
Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
By now, most readers are aware of three antitrust lawsuits that seek to address whether the NBA's league-wide lockout represents an illegal group boycott under Section 1 of the Sherman Act:- Butler v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:37 am
Court of Appeals in Chicago ruled yesterday.The state-action doctrine allows municipalities to engage in conduct that would otherwise violate antitrust law when the conduct is authorized by the state under a policy to displace competition, the court explained.The doctrine stems from the fact that the Sherman Antitrust Act does not apply to sovereign entities. [read post]
