Search for: "State v. Vanness"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm
You lack sufficient cause to stop the van to investigate an immigration offense, but you notice that the van is speeding in violation of state traffic law. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
New York’s long-settled marriage recognition rule affords comity to out-of-state marriages and “recognizes as valid a marriage considered valid in the place where celebrated” (Van Voorhis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:24 am
Van Hollen saga. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:49 am
Per Best Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:49 am
Per Best Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:06 pm
Van Hollen (Wisconsin recently became one of the 28 states challenging the mandate in court) and Democratic state representative Jon Richards, who will defend the constitutionality of the mandate. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:19 am
They were identified as: Edgar Smith, Kimberly Smith, Edgar Smith,V and Emily Smith. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Ritchie v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:36 pm
"Trotter v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
Van Parys On January 11, 2012 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
The 6-3 ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is now considering a case squarely raising that question, Vans v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (“Van Breda”); Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:29 am
Telek v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
In today’s case (Van v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
