Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 9:21 am
Steve Vladeck posted this on Twitter (a.k.a. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
" And at "Just Security," Steve Vladeck had a post titled "Better Never Than Late? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:02 am
The letter cites reporting in Lawfare from Benjamin Wittes and Steve Vladeck that revealed a DHS memo offering legal guidance to analysts on "expanded intelligence activities" in response to activity connected to the protests. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm
Hello, and welcome back to the National Security Law Podcast, with co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck! [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:03 am
” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
Steve Vladeck’s post focuses on the interesting question of whether prosecutions of contractor employees abroad under MEJA might sometimes result in indictments for activities that are sufficiently unrelated to the US military mission that they are either unconstitutional or at least unwise. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:57 pm
In a post on the American Constitution Society’s blog, Steve Vladeck takes aim at section 1031 of the Senate version of the NDAA FY ’12, which concerns detention authority under the 9/18/01 AUMF. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Roger Alford and Steve Vladeck debate the wisdom of this kind of accountability here and here. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
” At Just Security, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief opposing certiorari in a challenge to the constitutionality of the military death penalty. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
Vladeck: Let's answer the question about the regulatory impact of commercial speech doctrine. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:30 am
In light of these questions, it’s hard to imagine a more timely and relevant constitutional law article than Lindsay Wiley and Steve Vladeck’s forthcoming article. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:40 pm
In response to this post Ben and I put up earlier regarding the Graham bill’s detention provision, Steve Vladeck has written a reply and given me permission to post it below. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Law Professor Steve Vladeck has this post at SCOTUSblog on yesterday's argument in Davila v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:40 am
” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:58 pm
By Steve Vladeck, professor at the University of Texas School of Law The effective end of the Supreme Court’s term on Friday touched off what has become an annual tradition: hot takes summarizing the justices’ work over the preceding nine months based upon data aggregated from the justices’ decisions. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
Bellia (Notre Dame), Heather Elliott (Alabama), Evan Lee (UC-Hastings), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Jim Pfander (Northwestern), Amanda Tyler (UC-Berkeley), and Steve Vladeck (American). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:24 pm
Two weeks ago, I had a few posts discussing the scope of detention authority authorized under section 1031 of the then-pending SASC version of the NDAA, in response to Steve Vladeck’s concern that the language could be read to encompass detention of persons having nothing to do with the 9/18/01 AUMF. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck When Congress chartered the federal judicial system in the Judiciary Act of 1789, the creation of a chief legal officer for the government—an attorney general—was almost an afterthought. [read post]
