Search for: "The Dear Rich Staff"
Results 321 - 340
of 539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 9:40 am
" I'm so glad you asked (although the Dear Rich staff is upset that you think we would answer your question in a such a flippant manner.) [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:44 am
The Dear Rich staff feels your pain... and your letter did prompt us to file an application for our moniker (see above). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:46 am
We've said it many times before but like Smokey the Bear, the Dear Rich Staff never tires of repeating our mantra: big companies that own licensed characters don't like it when people make money off unauthorized reproductions. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:48 am
We wish we could be more decisive but the trouble with trademark law is that sometimes, the Dear Rich Staff has no friggin' clue how the courts (or UPSTO) will rule. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:47 am
The Dear Rich Staff recommends that you look through the termination paperwork to see how it deals with intangible assets. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:41 am
Below is a sample short form t-shirt license taken from Getting Permission (written by the Dear Rich staff). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
The Dear Rich Staff respects you for coming up with one great idea and hope you come up with more. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:35 am
The Dear Rich staff thinks that's a long shot, since most books published before 1963 are probably in the PD. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Paradoxically the Dear Rich Staff believes you'll run less risk if you don't ask for permission. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:26 am
Dear Rich: Over 13 years ago I purchased MC Hammer's storage units which contained all his personal property such as awards, costumes, music, wedding pictures, business records, tons of mementos, etc. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:00 am
According to the Dear Rich staff, determining whether your Dad is owed money depends on several factors. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:07 am
To get a more comprehensive answer, the Dear Rich staff would need to know: Did you create the software at work (or using work equipment)? [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:24 am
The Dear Rich staff is more more concerned about your rights under trade mark law (it's two words in the U.K.) [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:57 am
The Dear Rich staff believes you're best off dumping Sigmund from the imagery and just proceeding with Dr. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:08 pm
The Dear Rich Staff realizes this may not be what you wanted to hear ... but sometimes the easiest approach may be to let go and move on. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:49 am
(And on a completely different topic, the Dear Rich staff wonders if this is trademark infringement.) [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 8:53 am
Dear Rich: I have a question. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:24 am
Of course, the Dear Rich staff notes that your biggest challenge may not be getting the patent, it could be gathering the resources to stop others from playing it without paying you. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 7:41 pm
Dear Rich: What does "perpetuity" mean in the case of a music publishing contract? [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:18 am
The Dear RIch Staff notes that one of the factors used to determine infringement is whether The Bark is likely to "bridge the gap" between decals and t-shirts, and jewelry. [read post]
