Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 321 - 340 of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
Officer Jorgensen observed many signs that the Church was operating a dispensary, including cabinets filled with cannabis in jars, cannabis-infused drinks and edibles, vape cartridges, teas, creams, oils, cash registers, scales, packaging materials, bags, medicine bottles, pricing information, and an ATM machine. . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
At the other end of the scale, "dead" has been replaced in 35 of the languages. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Such support services can create the large economies-of-scale in the production process that affordability for middle- and lower-income people require. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nevertheless, the People object to his diversion into treatment, arguing that the allegations concerning his possession of a large quantity of cocaine and money, a scale, and ammunition indicate that he is a drug dealer, not a drug addict. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
”  Well, on a scale of 1 to 10 for loathsome, Phelps gets a 12, but so do Neo-Nazis and some other people, and they’ve got First Amendment rights, too. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:48 am
  I won't attempt to defend my views on this one, and reasonable people can (and surely do) disagree. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm by Guest Blogger
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael
Perhaps the scale and importance of social media is best represented in numbers. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]