Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm
The court explained that in that situation, “pricing and contracting negotiations in the United States alone do not constitute or transform those extraterritorial activities into a sale within the United States for purposes of §271(a). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm
United States provides hope to contractors that incur higher than anticipated costs on a requirements contract or, alternatively, on construction contracts where line item prices are based on estimated quantities. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 12:32 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Loeza v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
The Court asked the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
United States District Judge William Shubb rejected the NCAA’s motion and held that the allegation of horizontal price-fixing based on the creation of the volunteer coach position was sufficient to show possible antitrust injury. [read post]
