Search for: "United States v. Stanley"
Results 321 - 340
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
Iqbal and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
Implied Bias Case The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Indeed, its Ur-text, Footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Lawyer of the Year: Stanley G. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[United States] : [Distributed by] PBS, c2010. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:56 am
” And: The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in 2002 that states could not execute people who were mentally retarded. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 11:22 am
The case is United States. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 5:12 am
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009] [ citations omitted].) [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania cerebral palsy resource guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
The case is Glossip v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
Stanley G. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am
” She added that “while defendants’ contention that an investor could not purchase an RDS in the United States without a corresponding overseas transaction may be true, it does not change the fact that a purchase in the United State still took place. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
United States, a sentencing guidelines case, may prompt the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am
United States 20-489Issues: (1) Whether 10 U.S.C. [read post]
