Search for: "United States v. Levin"
Results 321 - 340
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. ___, 129 S. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
Levine [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Not surprisingly, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and plaintiffs’ bar have been pushing for an expansive reading of the law so that more such sales would be governed by American antitrust law. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
United Websites, Ltd, D2002-0272 (WIPO August 21, 2002). [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:01 am
Levine [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:15 am
(Levin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm
As we argued in an amicus brief, we hope New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:21 am
The Complainant in Juicy Details B.V. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
—Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, 470). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
—Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, 470). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
Levine (Elon) Geoffrey A. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
NY State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
In re United Scaffolding Inc., No. 10-0526 (DDB). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
