Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 321 - 340 of 1,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
Sharpe an impermissible form of substantive due process, as impermissible as, say, Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:31 am by Steve Vladeck
Every jurisdiction in the United States requires at least some criminal defendants to make certain payments to the government tied to their convictions. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am by Erin Miller
The topic was revived as a news item by President Obama's sharp criticism of the decision in his State of the Union address last night. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm by Epstein Becker & Green
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board's notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
United States) that also had cut back on the concept of exclusion. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:24 pm by Florian Mueller
While the automotive industry has by now overwhelmingly adopted the Avanci patent licensing model, some clean-up on the litigation front is still needed.In the summer, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied Continental's second petition for a rehearing en banc of its "antitrust" case against the Avanci patent pool and some of its key licensors (Nokia, Sharp, Optis). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am by Florian Mueller
Theoretically, Panel Opinion 2.0 could have a different outcome and--for instance--remand the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas with the instruction to allow Conti to amend its complaint again. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:02 am
[Smoking Gun] Related: New York - United States - New York City - Chris Brown - Metro Areas [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:27 am
“As an alien captured and detained within the United States,” the Court said, “he has a right to habeas corpus protected by the Constitution’s Suspension Clause. [read post]