Search for: "United States v. State of NJ" Results 321 - 340 of 629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by PaulKostro
Two fundamental principles are consistently applied in the personal jurisdiction cases decided by the United States Supreme Court under the federal Due Process Clause since International Shoe Company v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by PaulKostro
The United States Supreme Court has recognized that applying minimum contacts principles to matrimonial litigation is a fact-sensitive endeavor. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Sean Wajert
On the merits of the reconsideration argument, the court said that the NJ holding was at odds with the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in World-Wide Volkswagen and Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:38 am by admin
A federal judge in New York May 23 ordered the Bank of China to freeze the assets of alleged counterfeiters in China and to turn over information on credit card transactions involving those firms (Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:50 pm by PaulKostro
“[A] parent’s rights to the care and companionship of his or her child are so fundamental as to be guaranteed protection under the First, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:16 am by PaulKostro
New Jersey adheres to the first-filed rule, and ordinarily will stay or dismiss a civil action in deference to the jurisdiction, whether in the United States or overseas, in which the substantially similar litigation was first filed. [read post]