Search for: "V D"
Results 321 - 340
of 76,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
Regina v Lee [2010] EWCA Crim 1404; [2010] WLR (D) 160 “The offence under s 85(5)(b) of the Medicines Act 1968 of selling or supplying a medicinal product which was misleadingly labelled or marked in respect of the nature or quality of the product, where such sale or supply was done by a person ‘in the course of a business carried on by him’, could not be committed by a person who was merely employed or engaged by the business which carried out the sale or supply,… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:07 am
Donald v Ntuli [2010] EWCA Civ 1276; [2010] WLR (D) 291 “Whether, in view of the principle of open justice, it was necessary for a court to restrain publication of the existence of proceedings and the anonymity of the parties, depended on the facts of the particular case. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:53 am
Arif v Zar and another [2012] EWCA Civ 986; [2012] WLR (D) 239 “In relation to a bankruptcy order, the court sitting in bankruptcy had to give consideration to the possibility that a person might attempt to use the protection of the order as a shield against the claims of their spouse for ancillary relief. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:50 am
Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107; [2011] WLR (D) 40 “The policy behind the limitation period for defamation cases being shorter than that in personal injuries claims was clear, since the defamatory impact of libel or slander was likely to be transient and Parliament evidently intended that a claimant should assert and pursue his need for vindication speedily. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying all the… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936; [2011] WLR (D) 385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
Regina v Brewster [2010] EWCA Crim 1194; [2010] WLR (D) 159 “Where a party sought to admit evidence of a witness’s bad character which bore only indirectly on his credibility, and that credibility was a matter in issue in the proceedings and of substantial importance in the context of the case as a whole, such evidence was only admissible pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 as evidence of substantial probative value on the issue of… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:31 am
Regina v Varsani [2010] EWCA Crim 1938; [2010] WLR (D) 237 “Where an offender was convicted of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of duty on counterfeit cigarettes, contrary to s 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, the reference to the retail price of cigarettes ‘of that description’ in s 5(1) of the Tobacco Products Duty Act 1979, as amended, by which the value of the duty was to be calculated, was to the retail price of genuine… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:43 am
Regina v Gnango [2010] EWCA Crim 1691; [2010] WLR (D) 201 “Where a defendant voluntarily engaged in an exchange of gunfire with ‘B’ in a public place amounting to an affray, and in the course of that gunfire B shot and killed a passer-by and the defendant foresaw that in the course of that gunfire B might shoot with intent to kill or do really serious injury, if each party sought to shoot the other but not be shot himself, there was no common purpose and therefore… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
La vérification des délais inscrits sur les documents par le mandataire et par l'assistant n'équivaut pas à une contre-vérification indépendante, car aucune vérification des délais correspondants sur le calendrier des délais n'était effectuée. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 pm
Remember the V Bar, also located in Las Vegas? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:02 pm
” (Ornelas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:17 pm
D. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:32 am
"Ericsson v D-Link: Standards, Patents, and Damages. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for effecting the… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:32 am
Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] UKSC 10; [2011] WLR (D) 77 “The special rule attributing causation to multiple defendants in mesothelioma cases also applied to a single defendant who, in breach of duty, exposed a victim to asbestos dust, where her only other known exposure was low level asbestos fibres in the general atmosphere and where she subsequently contracted the disease. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:09 am
CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor; Taylor v Stoutt and others [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 57 “There was no difference in principle between the ambit of a solicitor’s duty to the court in relation to the conduct and supervision of disclosure of documents and the conduct and supervision of any redaction of disclosable doccuments prior to inspection. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:07 am
Carvalho v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Omar [2010] EWCA Civ 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 344 “A short term of imprisonment on the part of an EEA worker during his first five years in the United Kingdom meant that the time needed to establish a right permanently to reside had to begin anew after his imprisonment had concluded. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
R (Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Gaines-Cooper) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 83; [2010] WLR (D) 45 “The revenue had not been shown, in considering cases founded upon asserted non-resident status, to have altered its interpretation or application of relevant guidance material. [read post]
