Search for: "Weiss v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But, asked Marie-Andree Weiss, is it right? [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vullo (Paul, Weiss LLP). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 10:12 pm
I. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
We agree with most of the Morrison comments (which are technical) and reserve judgment on the Weiss comment.We recommend a "yes" vote on all three amendments, and here's why.Proposed Amendment Number 1: Single issue class actions aren't that frequent and should stay that way. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
