Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 3381 - 3400 of 14,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:21 am by Ashley Holland
Neapco case, which many were hoping to clear up Section 101. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:19 am by SHG
The 10th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
By clarifying the boundaries of judicial takings, we also hope to shed light on the constitutional foundations for numerous state-court doctrines concerning the retroactivity of new property rules. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Let’s hope that signal is received. [read post]