Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 3381 - 3400 of 31,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
He also testified that he had never actually seen any of these people use KaZaA. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
” It is correct that the Supreme Court has not given any guidance on how the serious harm issue should be dealt with. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm by Steven Calabresi
 All of the people on that list are Senate-confirmed officers of the United States who could be given the additional power of prosecuting a case outside of their own districts. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:29 am by Venkat
How arbitration clauses in online terms would fare post-Concepcion was an open question. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Taylor and Banks (75 NY2d 277 [1990]) experts have been permitted to testify about how rape trauma syndrome is a recently recognized psychological disorder that can cause some rape victims to appear calm and relaxed after their attacks and lead them to delay reporting their rapes. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
MySpace ruling (both involving offline sexual assaults by people who met on MySpace), the Witkoff v. [read post]