Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 3401 - 3420 of 4,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Court found that the Act defined a “public utility” as any company which “owns, controls, operates or manages, within this State, directly or indirectly, for public use, any plant, equipment or property used or to be used for or in connection with, or owns or controls any franchise, license, permit or right to engage in . . . the production, storage, or transmission . . . of heat, cold, power, electricity, water, or light. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Some guidance about the validity of release can be found in the case styled, Ranger Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm by Michelle Claverol
In affirming the verdict and interest award, the court of appeals stated: The phrase “interruption of business,” as used in section 13Q of the DIC policy, does not require ADM to show that its corn processing plants stopped or slowed production. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the key attorneys in the NY v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
The IPKat has an acute dislike of legal actions that look destined to fail and which unnecessarily prolong the state of hostilities between the parties. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:49 am by Adrian Lurssen
Sutherland in Upstart Business Journal/Portfolio.com: Kickstarter Turns Crowdfunding Up To 11 Patton Boggs in Revolution Analytics’ Revolutions: EU court’s SAS ruling conflicts with Oracle v Google McDermott Will & Emery in WSJ’s Corruption Currents: High Tide: From Wal-Mart Testing Corporate Citizenship To Being Unfit For Command Reed Smith on Lenders 360: Why Do Lenders Disdain Bankruptcy Court? [read post]