Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 9,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
As Wikipedia explains, pendent jurisdiction is theauthority of a United States federal court to hear a closely related state law claim against a party already facing a federal claim, described by the Supreme Court as `jurisdiction over nonfederal claims between parties litigating other matters properly before the court. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
" (page 11) Of course, the states will appeal this to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
This quotation from the Supreme Court's opinion in Tumey v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm
… 'forfeited his ability to keep secret his actions at the international border … when he sued United States Customs and Border Patrol agents.'"). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am
Ball State University (which we blogged on here), the United States Supreme Court finished employees off with the 5-4 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:02 pm
However, the Ninth Circuit took a different view in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a contractor won its suit against a defendant but was still unable to recover on the lien's bond. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
But for asylum seekers, proving their true age can alter the direction of their lives. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:02 am
But what State Farm did here, if it proves true, goes far, far beyond that. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
The dual sovereignty doctrine has been upheld by the USSC in U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:31 am
It is the registered proprietor of many trademarks for LA QUINTA and variants of that trademark both within the United States and internationally, including in Italy where the Respondent is domiciled. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
United States, 263 U.S. 50 (1923), does not provide any guidance regarding prosecution laches because Woodbridge never received a patent. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Specht v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
[1] FTC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 US 496,… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:12 am
Washington; United States v. [read post]
