Search for: "U. S. Appeal of"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 6,188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2021, 4:02 am
TTABlog Test: How Did These Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out? [read post]
Precedential No. 30: TTAB Okays Warranty Services for Applicant's Goods Sold Under Third-Party Marks
26 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Husqvarna Aktiebolag, 91 USPQ2d 1436 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].The question on appeal, then, was "whether applicant's activities, as set forth in its identification of services, constitute a service for which a service mark registration may be issued. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Further, the court of appeals found that any alleged use was not a proximate cause of Annab’s injuries. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
10; 28 U. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:53 am
Yoo, U. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
I-2 U 31/16). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
Bostick, 501 U. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Bad Cops Make Good Law, Quon -- Fourth Amendment Privacy Interests in Text Content
22 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
Quon appealed (civil) Rule 59 motions from the federal district court. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:11 pm
The court's entire substantive discussion: Obodai's appeal is without merit substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its well-reasoned summary judgment decision....In short, the district court correctly determined that Demand Media was eligible for the User Storage Safe Harbor under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U .S.C. s 512, because the undisputed evidence established that Demand Media satisfied the… [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
Secretary-General U Thant in 1974; Capt. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:03 am
After claim construction, the district court granted Amazon’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Amazon was not infringing one of the patents, that one patent was invalid and Innovation stipulated to noninfringement of the last patent but reserved its right to appeal the construction issue. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of these arguments with the plaintiff’s claim that § 230 does not preempt state law intentional torts: [U]nder the facts of this case, we need not decide whether plaintiffs' may bring their intentional infliction of emotional distress claim independently of other recognized theories. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:42 am
If you or a loved one has been convicted, you will likewise need a skilled attorney to handle your appeal and/or motion for a new trial. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
See 11 U. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:25 pm
Read More: Court rejects Ark. inmate’s toilet-paper appeal New Jersey v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:19 am
A U. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 2:22 am
Although “places of worship” were a permitted use in the zoning district where the property was located, the town’s municipal code officer and the zoning board of appeals determined that the proposed facility would be more akin to a school or a camp, neither of which were permitted uses. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
’ Thomson appeals. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and “remand[ing] for that court to revisit whether Alaska’s campaign contribution limits are consistent with our First Amendment precedents,” including one 2006 precedent, Randall v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Concepcion (2011) 563 U. [read post]
