Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
United States and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
IP scholar Paul Heald states in the foreword that this edited collection is a significant contribution to copyright law, one that provides the raw material necessary for a rational law of music copyright, a law that could, and should, defer more to musicians themselves. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am
The Supreme Court first confronted the use of devices to monitor vehiclular movment in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
House of Representatives voted to overturn the D.C. gun ban in 2004 and again in 2005.Then, last March, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned the ban, giving gun rights advocates a major victory in their long battle over the restrictions.The ruling drew strong reaction from both sides of the gun control issue. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
But while European companies can breathe a little easier in the United States, there's increasing unease at home about the emergence of European equivalents to the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Paul D. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Paul). [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Calling the motion "wholly without merit, both factually and legally," the judge, Denny Chin of United States District Court threw out the case. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
The existing studies suggest it is impactful, if sometimes anaemic, and advocates of reform are united in thinking it needs strengthening rather than abandonment. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Paul C. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
