Search for: "X, Y " Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2010, 4:40 pm by Betsy McKenzie
The idea is that prospective students should be able to decide if the investment in a JD from school X, Y or Z would be worth it in terms of the probable improvement in the student's earning power upon graduation.* An interesting side-note from Dean Van Zandt where he calculates that, on average, law students need to earn $65,000 in order to recoup the lost wages they would have earned in the three years of law school, plus the cost of law school. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
The U.S. can't use the testimony of a guy saying that he was told by X that the samples came from Y. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:44 am
This week Natasha and I discuss the adoption case Oxfordshire County Council v X, Y & J, along with the agreement between 14 EU states that will allow couples of different European nationalities to choose which nation's divorce laws will apply to them. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm by Mark Bennett
With such a vast pool of disaffected young men and women, the FBI could, if it spread its net beyond jihad, be arresting a new hapless loser for supporting terrorism every day—just send out agents pretending to be recruiters for the violent wing of X, Y, or Z cause, and you'll be beating the misguided idealistic underachievers off with a stick. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
One of the issues we addressed was the fact that the employees of the company were creating documents that would actually benefit others within the same company, but that the departments were so siloed that currently there was no logical way that employee 'X' could even find a document written by employee 'Y' because X was in Houston, Y was in Dallas, but no way to search each others documents. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:41 am by Jeff Shieh
For many applicants, especially those in the US, their post-prosecution involvement begins and ends with simply instructing their European agent to "finish the job and validate in countries X, Y and Z. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Adam Thierer
The fact that x and y happened at more or less the same time does not in itself mean that x must have caused y, or indeed vice-versa. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:06 am
This allows a simpler and more direct second medical use claim, of the form "substance X for use in the treatment of disease Y".3. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:13 am by Theo Francis
Throw in his most recent salary figure, and you can solve our two equations: Old severance = (2 or 3) x ($900,000 + $2,197,800) = (2 or 3) x $3,097,800 = $6.2 million or $9,2 million New severance = (2 or 3) x ($900,000 + $6,000,000) = (2 or 3) x $6,900,000 = $13.8 million or $20.7 million And that doesn’t include the acceleration of his various equity awards or continued health-insurance coverage and auto allowance. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:15 am by David Oxenford
 If the ad is making those typical political claims that are subject to interpretation (“Candidate X is a big spending liberal ”or “candidate Y favors policies that will lessen your freedom”), it is less likely that a court would find these to be actionable claims – particularly where the claims cannot really be proved false. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Gerard Magliocca
 If Congress said, “OK, but only if you amend your constitution to do X, Y, and Z,” that could pass muster under the Spending Clause if the reform proposals were sufficiently related to fiscal issues. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:53 am by Daniel Shaviro
., a country's parliament might pass a new law on June 1, 2010 to the effect that a given law (passed in 1950) has always meant X rather than Y, and this indeed would ostensibly nail down that, even back in 1950, it did indeed mean X not Y. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:53 am by Patent Arcade Staff
(g) said dot generator including x and y comparators and x and y stacks operatively connected to one another and to said display computer, said x and y comparators receiving, respectively, x and y counts corresponding to the x and y addresses of said symbols. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:55 am by All Language Alliance, Inc.
To illustrate, prior to the development of Private International Law, if foreign corporation X planned to convert company Y into a subsidiary, if a stock swap was not allowed in particular jurisdiction they would first have to form a corporation in the foreign jurisdiction and then take over Y in an absorption-type merger. [read post]
30 May 2010, 6:47 pm by Mike
 Boomers have been mortgaging Generations X's, Y's, and Me's futures. [read post]
30 May 2010, 5:24 am
If health insurance companies are required to pay out "X" but their premiums are limited to "Y" then they will have to find creative ways to stay in compliance.Here are some things that will happen, some of them starting before January of 2011.Carriers will look to cut administrative costs any way they can. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:45 pm by Jeralyn
As soon as they tap X and hear him talking to Y about something they believe is code for drugs, they get a pen register and trap and trace for the number, pre-paid or not. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:26 am by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
The modern workplace plays host to three generations: the baby boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:02 pm by jennis8
So, why are so many results-oriented Baby Boomers worried about Generation X and Y and their fixation with technology, social networking, and instant communication? [read post]