Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 7:37 am
SOTO), ET AL. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 5:27 am
The style of the opinion is, Eleanor Crose v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:18 am
Louisiana is a heavily Catholic state. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
In Holden v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
Co. of Amer. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Unlike other foodborne pathogens, STEC, including E. coli O157:H7, is not considered to be an environmental contaminant in fresh-cut produce manufacturing/processing plants. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:25 am
County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:52 am
Kyllo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Code, § 720(a); see also Daubert v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
In any case, having an agency such as the IABS would hand states parties a tool and an opportunity to be seized by the matter without having to set up a lengthy preparatory process for consultations under BTWC Article V. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
FCC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
In Friends of the Everglades v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
Thus, extreme care should be taken in evaluating the compliance status of the refineries with New Source Review, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, Title V Permitting, the Clean Air Act and the regulations promulgated under the Act, and similar state statutes and regulations. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm
It also plants doubts and raises the question of involvement of national authorities at one or other level. [read post]
