Search for: "United States v. Johnson" Results 3441 - 3460 of 3,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
But the Patriot Act amended the SMTJ statute to make clear that it covers overseas bases, at least "with respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 28, 2009)No implied cause of action under >>1981 for terminated White employee's race discrim claimt>4th Circuit>> Johnson v Mechanics & Farmers Bank, No. 07-1725 (4th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
That United States District Judge Paula Xinis included this paragraph in her recitation of “facts” is the first hint. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
Clare Ryan, Strasbourg Observers: Lee v the United Kingdom: A trend toward heightened pleading standards? [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:58 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[viii] We had the strong support of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated in 1999 that 73,000 cases of E. coli O157:H7 occur each year in the United States. [read post]