Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 269,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 2:36 am
Roult v North West Strategic Health Authority Court of Appeal “There was no power in the context of personal injury litigation to vary the terms of a settlement where there had been an unforeseen event which destroyed the assumption on which the settlement was made. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:42 am
Independent News and Media Ltd and Others v A Court of Appeal “Hearings in the Court of Protection would normally be in private but in certain circumstances the media could be authorised to report them. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:49 am
Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (a Firm) Court of Appeal “A solicitor rendering his fee note had to consider carefully, if charging uplift, whether the relevant work was contentious or non-contentious. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
Barry v Southwark London Borough Council Court of Appeal “When determining whether a person claiming housing assistance had been unemployed for no more than six months and was a worker, a housing authority was entitled to look at his employment record in order to tell whether the work was effective and genuine, and not marginal and [...] [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
Baker and Others v Quantum Clothing and Others Court of Appeal Whether a work place was in fact made and kept safe was to be judged objectively without reference to what might have earlier been thought to be good practice. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:42 am
Islington London Borough Council v Ladele Court of Appeal “A local authority was entitled to compel a registrar to officiate at the registrations of same-sex civil partnerships although she objected to such unions on the ground of her religious beliefs. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:13 am
Robbie the Pict v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen’s Bench Division “A Gatsometer BV Type 36 traffic light camera was an approved device for recording the position of motor vehicles in relation to light signals. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:51 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “As there was no evidence that Greece was a place from which a foreign asylum seeker would be deported to his own country to face inhuman and degrading treatment, there was nothing incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights in a statutory provision [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:30 am
A and Others v United Kingdom (Application No 3455/05) European Court of Human Rights “The European Court of Human Rights held the United Kingdom in breach of article 5.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of nonnational terrorist suspects, since they had not been detained with a view to deportation and the derogating [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:16 am
Barclay v British Airways plc Court of Appeal “A passenger slipping on a plastic strip embedded in the floor of an aircraft was not an accident since there was no distinct event which was not part of the usual, normal and expected operation of the aircraft and which had happened independently of anything done or omitted [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:47 am
Regina v T (Absent witness: Evidence) Court of Appeal “On an application for the admission of the statement of an absent witness, meeting the condition in section 116(2)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003 that the relevant person could not be found although such steps as it was reasonably practicable to take to find him had been taken, required [...] [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:15 am
Baker and Others v Quantum Clothing and Others Court of Appeal “Whether a work place was in fact made and kept safe was to be judged objectively without reference to what might have earlier been thought to be good practice. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:33 am
Allianz SpA and Another v West Tankers Inc Court of Justice of the European Communities “It was not open to a court in one European Union member state to order a party in a case before it to discontinue proceedings begun by that party in another member state on the ground that the parties had agreed to [...] [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:01 am
4 Eng Ltd v Harper and Others (No 2) Chancery Division “Where a person had entered into a transaction at an undervalue for the purpose of defrauding creditors, the nature of any order and the relief granted by the court under sections 423 and 425 of the Insolvency Act 1986 should reflect the general principles inherent in [...] [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:01 am
Ul-Haq and Another v Shah Court of Appeal “It was not possible to strike out a genuine claim on the ground that the claimant had been involved in a fraud upon the court in respect of an associated claim. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
Drew v Whitbread plc Court of Appeal “A party was not precluded from raising a matter before the costs judge on an assessment of costs which it had not raised before the trial judge when he exercised his discretion as to costs. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:10 am
Regina v Barker (Steven) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “It was not necessarily appropriate for a defence advocate to conduct detailed crossexamination of a child witness at trial in respect of evidence purported to undermine that child’s credibility. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:46 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A delay of two years and nine months in dealing with an application for indefinite leave to remain constituted culpable and undue delay on the part of the Secretary of State for the Home Department and was productive of conspicuous unfairness in the case [...] [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:31 am
Moriarty and Another v Atkinson and Others Court of Appeal “If a company, in breach of its promise to a payer to keep money in a separate client account to be held on trust, paid it into a deficit current account to be used to settle the company's debts, the payer could not trace the money paid [...] [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:29 am
Hughes v Borodex Ltd Court of Appeal “A landlord was entitled to serve notice to quit on a tenant who lost her protected tenancy by carrying out improvements in the property which resulted in its rent exceeding the assured protected tenancy limit. [read post]
