Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 35,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:33 am
In its unanimous decision yesterday in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:59 am
In it, he argued that Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I'm a little surprised that this opinion is unanimous.There are three different possible interpretations of the part of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 USC 1367(d), that says that state limitations periods are "tolled" during the pendency of a federal action (and for thirty days thereafter) if the federal court ultimately exercises its discretion to dismiss supplemental state law claims. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:59 am
Tons of fun stuff in this tiny little trademark dispute. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:00 pm
It's not been a good couple of days if you're Safeway.Yesterday, Safeway lost Heyen, an individual wage-and-hour case that Safeway lost at trial to the tune of around $24,000 and in which the Court of Appeal took little time in squarely rejecting Safeway's appeal (filed by their counsel at Littler Mendelson). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
On these facts -- at least at the summary judgment stage -- I have extraordinarily little doubt as to how I'd come out on whether the litigation privilege applies.Because I'm confident that the insurer both recognized and fully anticipated the threat of litigation.As would any insurance company not staffed by morons. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
Hu was formerly the President of the Stanford Law Review, so I'm sure the justices were rightly confident that he'd do a great job.It probably also helps, just a little, that he's a former law clerk to Justice Liu. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 11:59 am
If we were to hold that Moss Adams’s unilateral stipulation satisfied its burden of proof under Verdugo, it would have little incentive to take the jury waiver out of the agreements it provides to California clients. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 11:35 am
And very much appreciate Justice Evan's unanimous opinion holding that the cotenancy provision here was just fine.To me, the case for intervening in the contractual relations is at its nadir when the matter involves very sophisticated business parties, little to no public policy concerns, and provisions that are beneficial to both sides at different points in time. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:34 am
It may be important, but it’s a little early to say. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:21 am
On June 24, 2010, the Fourth District (Division Three) in Faulkinbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 4:54 pm
The most recent decision considering this issue is the Court of Appeal decision in Eckford v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
And this little stand was mighty successful. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] No Security Clearance for Employee Who Had Admitted to Downloading Child Pornography
30 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 pm
In fact, everyone seems to hate them, except of course, the company that wants to reach its hand into a settlement and grab a little something for itself. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
By Vincent Joralemon There is little consensus in defining “psychedelic. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
What you know about the lawsuit comes almost exclusively from your lawyer, who's not billing you (so you have very little reason to actively supervise him). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
But I think a little more neutral thought and analysis would definitely help. [read post]
