Search for: "U. S. Appeal of" Results 3481 - 3500 of 6,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 9:56 am
On cross-appeals, the South Carolina Court of Appeals found reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to submit punitive damages and a physician negligence issue to the jury, but upheld the denial of Palmer’s request for an independent medical exam. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do.Inigo Montoya: What's that? [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:54 am by Adam Klasfeld
In the brief’s “Table of Contents” alone, Trump accuses Bragg of “[u]nlawful” targeting, the DA’s prosecutorial team of “[u]nlawful” leaks, and Merchan and his daughter of “[c]onflicts. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:31 pm by Barry Barnett
 But, as the resort's brief on appeal pointed out, the contracts "were all backdated to dates prior to the accident. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:29 pm by Harold O'Grady
She also served in the New York County District Attorney’s Office, the New York State Attorney General’s Organized Crime Task Force, and as a special prosecutor in the U. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The answer is that the Court of Appeals never established such a rule. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The answer is that the Court of Appeals never established such a rule. [read post]
Despite the Seventh Circuit’s agreeing that the companies overcharged the government, it held that the retailers would avoid liability as they made “objectively reasonable” determinations of U&C pricing under an ambiguous regulation. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:23 pm
In the end, the 2001 ruling agreed with Parliament's reasoned apprehension. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:56 am
The New Politics of Abortion: An Equality Analysis of Woman-Protective Abortion Restrictions, 2007 U. [read post]
7 May 2014, 12:11 pm
The case is remanded for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion and this court’s previous decision in Medtronic I on Medtronic’s cross-appeal. [read post]