Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2007, 3:48 pm
' And generally the answer is no because we're dealing ... with people who have committed crimes or done something that they don't want to put on their resume. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
One reason folks are hanging back, people have told me, is they don't believe the feds will really get to the bottom of this: a few people will go to jail, some pleas will be entered, and they'll call it a day. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:58 pm
Yes, my husband is a Med Mal/PI attorney but I don't think it's relevant in this case. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
My senior citizen mother lives with me full-time and I don't want to expose her to anything that could kill her. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
But I don't think this is the last word on obviousness. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
But I don't think this is the last word on obviousness. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 6:24 am
Most experiments fail, and from that we learn what doesn't work. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:21 am
Buncher, a deputy public defender, said studies show the ordinances don't work because they create stress that can interfere with a sex offender's rehabilitation. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Texas has an Access to Justice Commission; but don’t be fooled. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
People don’t read that case much. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:49 pm
So we'll have to judge him on what he actually does. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
We're not talking trial proof. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm
I -- I notice that in -- in the government's position you don't argue the Commerce Clause very much, and I -- we have got at Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
If you don't have time for the client, don't take the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Magistrate Judge Bianchini says the DAs cannot be ostriches and other wonderful things.PEOPLE V. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
We don't see this at the federal level because Congress wisely prohibited the federal government from claiming copyright in any of its work. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:38 am
Don't know what you're doing? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:18 pm
It's an interesting academic question, but litigants don't like the uncertainty of academic questions. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
Just as defendants shouldn't "get off on a technicality," they likewise need a good, experienced defense attorney to make sure they don't "get convicted on a technicality" either! [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:59 am
We don't have all the answers either, but rather than capitulating to special interests, we should continue to search for fair solutions that represent the University's mission, its students, and the law in a way that educates students to be leaders of the digital 21st century. [read post]
