Search for: "Browning v. State" Results 3561 - 3580 of 8,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 10:37 am by Courtney Minick
In South Carolina, the state Supreme Court found that a lawyer working on the deceased singer James Brown’s estate misappropriated funds from the estate and filed tax returns without authority. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
Charlie Brown, a Gary Democrat and one of the bill's sponsors. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
GTA Linux User's Group, Political Outreach Group (David Collier-Brown, Editor) Slaw readers may have noticed a flurry of interest around Voltage v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Hamilton Bank and the assertion in state court of an England v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:52 pm by Savanna Nolan
In an interview on Law.com, Chemerinsky stated he thinks this case has the “potential to be the Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
New SB 35 Implementing Regulations Senate Bill 35, more colloquially known as “SB 35,” was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 29, 2017. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am by Christine Corcos
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am by Dan Bushell
  It disagreed with what it understood the 11th Circuit to hold in Brown v. [read post]