Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 3561 - 3580 of 7,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 10:04 am by Jason Shinn
Here’s an excerpt from the complaint, Van Dyke Horn LLC v Peter Van Dyke: This case is about an equity member, officer and high-level executive of VDH, Peter Van Dyke, intentionally diverting and misappropriating trade secrets of VDH and converting assets of VDH, including clients, for his own benefit after failing to force his partner, Marilyn Horn, to sell her interest in VDH to him for pennies. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:01 pm
Enligt vad man kan läsa pÃ¥ bloggarna blev Rost själv lite förvÃ¥nad först, men sen har han döpt om sin egen blogg till "Peter Rost for FDA commissioner".Det finns en önskan frÃ¥n flera hÃ¥ll att fÃ¥ en… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:37 am
The ‘situation' was born from Peter Smith J's decision not to recuse himself from the case of Howell v Lees Millais (2007). [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
Apparent findings to the opposite in Basildon v Whelan and in Kensington & Chelsea RLBC v Hislop [2004] HLR 434 were not part of the ratio of the decisions in those cases. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Laura Orr
Peter Martin’s Intro to Legal Citation), is a required skill for any legal researcher. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Peter Sherwood discusses privity, professional negligence and the interplay of tort and contract. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
– Philip Steele Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law: Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing, Subject access requests: Court of Appeal bolsters right to disclosure of data – Ashley Hurst and Peter Barratt [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
   Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
  It is no good, using Mr Richard Miller QC's 'super-telescope' analogy (Euromarket Designs Inc v Peters and another [2000] All ER (D) 1050), to say that even if the website can be 'seen' from the jurisdiction it is active within it. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Now, with IP Bridge suing Volkswagen in Munich, the pressure is increasing on Europe's largest automotive group to upgrade its license.This newly discovered litigation once again confirms that Munich is the automotive patent enforcement hotspot: just yesterday I reported on a couple of Sisvel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Mitch Stoltz and Parker Higgins
Not only is it fair, but as Professor Peter Jaszi noted during the hearing it is also tremendously beneficial, enabling the indexing and searching of huge sets of works. [read post]