Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 6,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Maryland v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:16 pm
The complaint lacked evidence that the purchaser bought Nexium in response to the manufacturer’s representations concerning the quality of Nexium in relation to Prilosec.MichiganIn order to state a Michigan Consumer Protection Act (CPA) claim, a payor was required to show that it was a consumer that purchased the prescription drug for personal use. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
" Fred Pfenninger and Cummins Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan agreed with Hosanna-Tabor that the ministerial exception barred the EEOC’s suit because the claims asserted concerned the employment relationship between a church and its minister. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
Contrary to Respondents’ suggestion, the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If anything, the Reconstructors’ determination to use Article V even though doing so required irregularities might testify to Article V’s indispensability. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am
(The Schuette decision upheld a voter-approved ban in Michigan on the use of race as a factor in choosing entering classes in the state’s public universities and colleges. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:44 pm
Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0144n.06 Rose v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
Among those: challenges to aspects of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that block legally wed gay couples from receiving various benefits under federal law, as well as challenges to California's Proposition 8, which amended the state's constitution to prohibit gay marriage. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Winn, 09-987, and Garriott v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Ct., Aug. 21, 2009), a Massachusetts state appeals court affirmed (with a minor modification) a lower court's holding that the Department of Corrections provide an additional Imam to perform weekly Jum'ah services and that female officers be prohibited from touching the genital or anal areas of any male Muslim inmates except in emergency situations.In Sandeford v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Gilmer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
I guess I forget, being in Michigan, that Cobell’s billions are pretty influential. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:07 am
Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Cantrell - a 22-page opinion: "We conclude that the trial court's order transferring jurisdiction of the custody proceedings to the Michigan court was not contrary to either Indiana or Michigan law, that its telephonic conference with the Michigan court did not violate Father's due process rights, and finally that the trial court did not commit prima facie error in transferring jurisdiction of the case to Michigan. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Monday, December 2: No. 12-515 — Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:11 pm
In Morse v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:52 pm
The Michigan Court of Appeals, in Hund v Hund, No.334313, a divided opinion, affirmed a lower court order that denied defendant-mother’s request to change the legal residence of the child, OMH, to Canada while granting plaintiff-father’s motion for primary physical custody. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
State v. [read post]
